Here are the results of our survey. A detailed analysis will follow later this week, in the meantime: In general, you were pleased with the appointment. You were strongly backing the move to a full-time boss, but criticised the board for taking so long over the decision.
You valued the continuity that Steve should bring, which we see as an endorsement of Colin Lippiatt and the squad he put together. Finally, you're pretty confident that Yeovil will still have a good final Conference position this season.
Special note: Most of the votes were received before the dramatic win over Rushden, but still backed Steve. When time allows, we'll do a quick check to see how those votes received after that match differed from those received before.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. How pleased are you with the appointment of Steve Thompson? |
|
|
Giving a score of 1 to 'very pleased' and 5 to 'mightily displeased', we get an average satisfaction of:
|
2.18
|
|
|
| |
|
a) Very pleased (18/76) |
24%
|
|
|
| |
|
b) Quite pleased (37/76) |
49%
|
|
|
| |
|
c) He was acceptable (or don't know) (11/76) |
14%
|
|
|
| |
|
d) Displeased (9/76) |
12%
|
|
|
| |
|
e) Mightily displeased (1/76) |
1%
|
|
|
|
|
2. Do you think it's important that we have a full-timer in charge? |
|
|
Giving a score of 1 to 'definite YES' and 5 to 'definite NO', we get an average score of:
|
1.43
|
|
|
| |
|
a) Definitely YES (49/76) |
64%
|
|
|
| |
|
b) Probably YES (22/76) |
30%
|
|
|
| |
|
c) No preference/don't know (4/76) |
5%
|
|
|
| |
|
d) Probably NO (1/76) |
1%
|
|
|
| |
|
e) Definitely NO (0/76) |
0%
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the continuity, which we hope ST will bring, important? |
|
|
Giving a score of 1 to 'definite YES' and 5 to 'definite NO', we get an average score of:
|
1.65
|
|
|
| |
|
a) Definitely YES (39/76) |
51%
|
|
|
| |
|
b) Probably YES (27/76) |
36%
|
|
|
| |
|
c) No preference/don't know (5/76) |
7%
|
|
|
| |
|
d) Probably NO (4/76) |
5%
|
|
|
| |
|
e) Definitely NO (1/76) |
1%
|
|
|
|
|
4. Where do you now expect Yeovil to finish in the Conference? |
|
|
Giving a score of 1 to 'a' and 5 to 'e', we get an average degree of confidence of (though an average probably doesn't mean much for this question!):
|
1.82
|
|
|
| |
|
a) Top three (35/76) |
46%
|
|
|
| |
|
b) Top six (30/76) |
40%
|
|
|
| |
|
a) No preference/don't know (1/76) |
1%
|
|
|
| |
|
d) Top half (10/76) |
13%
|
|
|
| |
|
e) In relegation fight (0/76) |
0%
|
|
|
|
|
5. The long trial period was claimed by some to be unsettling. Do you think the board should have acted more quickly, or were they right to take their time over the decision? |
|
|
Giving a score of 1 to 'a' and 5 to 'e', we get an average score of:
|
3.55
|
|
|
| |
|
a) They were definitely right (4/76) |
5%
|
|
|
| |
|
b) They were probably right (17/76) |
17%
|
|
|
| |
|
a) No preference/don't know (6/76) |
6%
|
|
|
| |
|
d) They were probably wrong (31/76) |
31%
|
|
|
| |
|
e) They were definitely wrong (18/76) |
18%
|
|
|
|
